Critically Acclaimed
Faith and Politics: To What Political Party Does Christianity Belong?

As a part of The Veritas Forum , Dr. Timothy Keller, Senior Pastor of NYC’s Redeemer Presbyterian Church was interviewed by journalist Martin Bashir and Columbia University’s Dr. David Eisenbach on the topic of his 2009 book, “Reason for God? Belief in an Age of Skepticism.”

According to their website, “Veritas Forums are university events that engage students and faculty in discussions about life’s hardest questions and the relevance of Jesus Christ to all of life. We seek to inspire the shapers of tomorrow’s culture to connect their hardest questions with the person and story of Jesus Christ. 

“‘We’ refers to the hundreds of university community members who desire to host, plan, and coordinate a Veritas Forum on their local campuses, and the headquarter team in Cambridge, MA, with regional staff across North America and Europe.”
 
A high school friend of mine posted a link to the interview on Facebook, and I found the following sound bites about religion, politics, and privilege (specifically from Dr. Eisenbach’s Q&A portion with Dr. Keller) particularly interesting.

When asked about his views on the appropriate Christian response to political support of a candidate, Dr. Keller’s response matches my beliefs directly as to how church leadership should engage their congregations politically. 

“At our church, I never even indirectly endorse a candidate. I also - we don’t use either code words, or rhetoric that would make, say Democrats or Republicans, Conservatives or Liberals feel ill at ease there. I’m registered to vote and I did just vote and I’m not telling you, and not only that I don’t tell anybody in my church and here’s the reason why: I really don’t think a party can capture Christianity. I’ve been saying for 30 years that if the Christian faith gets too identified with a party, it reduces Christianity to a political position. And I also know that actually when I read my Bible I see a breadth of concerns - a sort of a spectrum of concerns and I don’t see one party having the, cornering the market on them. So what we do at our church is we try to say not, ‘Don’t be political.’ I’m not saying that. But we want all- we want Democrats and Republicans to feel welcome and to be there and to feel like they can be part of the community. We talk about direct action on issues. Like say, ‘Go after poverty in this neighborhood. Go after education problems in this burrough. Go after environmental problems. As a church lets do it, and let’s get deep into the Christian text, and let’s be shaped by the Gospel, and then go out and vote the way your conscience takes you.’”

“…Seriously, it’s actually very important for me not to tell my folks how I vote… I’m not trying to knock anybody, but I think it’s a very bad idea for a Christian church to get too identified with a candidate or a party.”

Christians should be focused on engaging in direct action that improves the lives of other people. How can a political party claim to own the viewpoints of God? Right on, Dr. Keller!

He continues this discussion with a frank and honest look at how Christians have laid claim to both political parties, and identifies the difference in sides as being more in line with race than with religion.

“One of the scandals is that for the last 20 years, African American Christians and White Evangelicals - if you actually sit them down, ask them 50 questions about their positions - you’ll be amazed at how similar they are in their basic beliefs, Theological beliefs. Yet for the last 20 years Democrats could not win any elections without Black Christians, and Republicans could not win elections without White Christians. What’s up with that? I’m not even sure I know the answer. I’m not trying to say, ‘And that means…’ All I know is that when you actually get Black and White Christians together, their experience, see the experience is that Black Christians know that it’s not a safe country, and they believe that the Democrats realize that. And yet they also actually have some concerns that would bring them more in line with Republicans, but they’re not going to go there. A lot of White Christians who are Republicans just don’t seem to know what it’s like not to be White and fairly privileged. And so honestly if everybody sat down and talked about it, I really think that everybody would realize you really shouldn’t be in the back pocket of any- if you’re a Christian - you really shouldn’t be in the back pocket of any particular party year after year after year after year; that you ought to look at candidates, you ought to look at issues, that you ought to be - and it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be part of a party. You have to register to vote. I’ve registered to vote.”

I agree that churches should bring their congregations together around issues and should provide opportunities for direct action. Through living out one’s faith, one will gain a strong sense of what one believes to be right and wrong, and can then decide how to vote and what political action on should take. No party should take ownership of the Christian faith. Rather, Christians should come together through shared experiences and open dialogue to gain a better understanding of our similar and dissimilar beliefs. Really, EVERYONE should!

The entire interview with both Dr. Eisenbach and Bashir can be viewed here.

February 7 - I Do!

I love iPhones. Thanks to the New York Times app, I received an alert today that made me smile from ear to ear. 

In case you haven’t heard… Proposition 8 - the 2008 state of California ballot measure that effectively halted statewide gay marriage (and resulted in MAJOR nationwide conversations, rallies, protests, advocacy work, and chatter) was ruled as unconstitutional by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. While marriage between same-sex couples will not immediately resume, there is hope that the decision will be taken to the U.S. Supreme Court for an ultimate decision that would impact the entire nation. There’s plenty of speculation as to whether or not the U.S. Supreme Court would take the case, but that is yet to be known.

What is known, however, is that this is one more step toward my ability to marry my future husband - and that is awesome.

Liz Feldman - Gay Marriage Equality

We in government don’t determine the quality or the validity of people’s relationships. If we did, we would not issue three quarters of the marriage licenses we do. And I know there are many people in the religious community who feel that we’re going to force this on them when that in fact is not true, we have never done that. I’m a Roman Catholic. The Catholic Church has the right to deny me the sacrament of marriage if they determine the person I choose to marry is unfit, or our relationship doesn’t meet their standards. City Hall does not have that right, that will not change under this bill. That will never change. Religious institutions can continue to practice discrimination with respect to the sacrament of marriage. We don’t. We shouldn’t. We should not do it for the gay and lesbian couples.

-New York State Senator Diane Savino, December 2, 2009

Check out the full speech.

“We have nothing to fear from commitment and love.”

New York State Senator Diane Savino speaks out in support of marriage equality on December 2, 2009. Thanks to Jason Mraz for posting this intelligent, inspiring, and thoughtful video on Twitter this afternoon!

Associated Press: President Obama, Matthew Shepard Act

The 1968 statute, passed in the aftermath of the assassination of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., applies to people attacked because of their race, religion or national origin. Under the new provision, the law will cover those attacked because of their sexual orientation, gender or gender identity.”

It’s about time! Thank you, President Obama!

Caption: President Barack Obama signs the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2009, during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Peter, Paul, and Mary - If I Had a Hammer

The world lost another musical icon on Wednesday, September 16, 2009. Mary Travers of Peter, Paul and Mary fame passed at the age of 72, due to complications from chemotherapy associated with a bone marrow transplant, according to the New York Times.

Mary Travers“I was raised to believe that everybody has a responsibility to their community and I use the word very loosely,” Ms. Travers told The Times in 1999. “It’s a big community. If I get recognized in the middle of the Sinai Desert I have a big community.”

It was a faithful community. Musical fashions changed, but fans stayed loyal to the music and the political ideals of the group. Ms. Travers once told the music magazine Goldmine, “People say to us, ‘Oh, I grew up with your music,’ and we often say, sotto voce, ‘So did we.’ ”

In tribute to the musical career and political activism of Peter, Paul, and Mary, I’ve posted the video of perhaps their most infamous song, If I Had a Hammer.

Charles Perez - Miami ABCCharles Perez - former openly gay news anchor for the Miami ABC Affiliate station - was recently let go, just after filing a discrimination claim against the employer. The station had bumped Perez from nights to weekends without a clear reason, and he courageously filed the discrimination case.

Read his view of the story at the link above.

Congratulations to Judge Sonia Sotomayor - the first Hispanic person receiving a lifetime appointment as a Supreme Court Justice in the United States’ Judicial Branch of government.

Judge Sotomayor was sworn in on Saturday, August 8, 2009, and will begin her work as a Supreme Court Justice immediately, although the court won’t hear any arguments until September 9.

See President Obama’s Weekly Address announcing his nomination for Judge Sotomayor.

Read about the potential impact on higher education accessibility and the future of affirmative action.

Barack Obama, A Stickler for Pronunciation

Lynne Truss - Eats, Shoots and Leaves - Illustrated ed.…yet another reason to love the man! This video (with Lee’s accompanying article on Politico) demonstrates President Obama’s respect for others’ names, cultures, and languages, which contributes greatly to his charisma and charm. I respect his sensitivity to diversity, and his thoughtfulness, and hope that these qualities rub off on a few of his political colleagues.

Perhaps he’s read Eats, Shoots and Leaves by Lynne Truss? (The hilarious illustrated edition is sitting on my bookshelf, and I am waiting ever-so-patiently to read the book when I have some spare time.)